https://law.temple.edu/aer/2019/03/23/opening-statement-v-argument-where-is-the-line/
It is to state what evidence will be presented, to make it easier for the jurors to understand what is to follow, and to relate parts of the evidence and testimony to the whole; it is not an occasion for argument. 2. Opening statement is intended as an outline of a party’s anticipated proof. 3. Opening statement should not refer to matters ...
https://library.temple.edu/
We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us.
https://offcampus.temple.edu/avoid-scams-and-fraud
What We Ask You to Do Look out for scams. Here are some of the most common red flags: Rent offered below market. Scammers know that innocent renters will be less cautious if they are motivated to close quickly on a deal so they don’t lose out on something too good to be true. Request to wire money.
https://law.temple.edu/aer/2020/05/26/admitting-and-using-exhibits-in-a-remote-trial/
Exhibits and Openings and Closings. Here, the issues should be no different than in a live trial. To use exhibits in an opening, before they are formally admitted, requires agreement of the opposing counsel and/or approval by the judge. For closing argument, again it should be no different than at a live trial.
https://sites.temple.edu/texttotalk/count/
This week your child is learning the words trunk, seeds, golden, and blossom. The words come from the book, Trees Count. Help your child learn the words. Here are easy definitions to use. A trunk is the main stem of a tree. Help your child count tree trunks in your neighborhood. Seeds are small hard things that plants grow from.
https://news.temple.edu/2021-10-29/5-tips-using-temple-libraries
Hop on to the e-textbook database and find your textbook! “What we have done is create a database of all the e-books we offer that are the same book that is being used in a course,” Bell said. “Not only can this save students time, it can save them money.”. —Matthew Aquino. Updated Oct. 27, 2022We all know the library as a beautiful ...
https://law.temple.edu/aer/2016/07/20/learning-mistakes-imperfect-cross-examination/
Here, counsel ignored the fundamentals of impeaching by omission – setting up the context and importance of the interview and the expectation that all critical details would be given and then simply establishing what was said. This called for a simpler, and almost friendly examination, one that could have proceeded along the following lines: